- The Prohuman
- Posts
- GPT-4o is better than Claude Sonnet 3.5 🤯
GPT-4o is better than Claude Sonnet 3.5 🤯
I tested GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 with same mega prompts. The results blew my mind. Here's the comparison...

Everyone was talking about Claude Sonnet 3.5, so I decided to check it out myself.
I teamed up with my friend Hasan to create detailed mega prompts and tested them in both models; Claude sonnet 3.5 and GPT-4o.
The results were truly shocking.
While GPT-4 won overall, it fell short in 2 areas.
Here’s a complete comparison with videos and prompts you can copy and paste to see the results for yourself:
Check this out on 𝕏/Twitter:
I tested GPT-4o and Claude Sonnet 3.5 with same mega prompts.
The results will blow your mind 🤯
Claude Sonnet 3.5 Vs. GPT-4o
(Video demos are included 👇)
— Ihtesham Haider (@ihteshamit)
10:11 AM • Jun 29, 2024

Together with Beehiiv:
I think you know this that we use Beehiiv to run our newsletter.
They help us send every newsletter to you.
Let’s hear what they have to say to you (our readers):
These stories are presented thanks to beehiiv, an all-in-one newsletter suite built by the early Morning Brew team.
Fully equipped with built-in growth and monetization tools, no code website and newsletter builder, and best-in-class analytics that actually move the needle.
The top newsletters in the world are built on beehiiv, and yours can be too. It's the most affordable option in the market, and you can try it for free — no credit card required.
Here’s who won this battle and why: ⚔️
1/ Social media posting
Winner: Claude Sonnet 3.5
Loser: GPT-4o
GPT-4o was close but it didn't do the job.
2/ Blogging
Winner: GPT-4o
Loser: Claude Sonnet 3.5
You can see the winner in the demo video.
Claude Sonnet 3.5 did create the blog but it didn't analyze the prompt and didn't followed the instructions.
3/ YouTube or video scriptwriting
Winner: GPT-4o
Loser: Claude Sonnet 3.5
When people use AI bots for script writing, they aren't using it just for the script.
They want to know what they have to do in each part of the script.
GPT-4o nailed it.
4/ TikTok and Instagram reel creator
Winner: Claude Sonnet 3.5
Loser: GPT-4o
Claude sonnet 3.5 understood the job and generated the exact content that was mentioned in the prompt.
5/ Coding - Project Calculator
Winner: GPT-4o
Loser: Claude Sonnet 3.5
Reasons why Claude 3.5 lost this battle:
1. It was fast but didn't focus on design.
2. It generated rough code meant only for testing.
3. Speed doesn't equate to quality; quick delivery meant half-done work.
In contrast, GPT-4o took its time and produced a functional, aesthetically pleasing calculator.
The only change I made to the GPT-4o code was adjusting the width from 200px to 300px to improve the calculator's appearance.
Which one is better?
It's hard to say. Here's what you should do:
1. Test the prompts.
2. Evaluate which one is better for your tasks.
If you need a bot that works quickly, use Claude Sonnet 3.5. However, if you're a professional seeking more in-depth solutions, GPT-4o is the better choice.

Whenever you’re ready, there are 2 ways we can help you:
Help you promote your product and service to 150k+ engineers, AI enthusiasts, entrepreneurs, creators, and founders. Sponsor us
Help you build a irresistible brand on 𝕏/Twitter and LinkedIn in less than 6 months. We’ve helped 100+ creators from YouTube, entrepreneurs, founders, executives, and people like yourself.
Email: [email protected]
Contact us and we’ll help you out.
Thanks.
Thanks for reading…
That’s a wrap.

What's on your mind?
Share your best ideas with us at [email protected].
We'll bring your ideas to life. Send them our way, and we'll get to work on making them a reality.
Did you find value in our newsletter today?Your feedback can help us create better content for you! |

![]() | I hope this was useful… If you want to learn more then visit this website. Get your brand, product, or service in front of 150,000+ professionals here. Follow us on 𝕏/Twitter to learn more about AI: |